Does Online EMDR Therapy Actually Work?

If you've been researching EMDR and you don't live near Rincon, this question has probably come up. The therapy involves a therapist guiding your attention, timing the bilateral stimulation, watching how you're responding. It sounds like something that needs to happen in a room together.

It's a reasonable thing to wonder about. And it's worth a real answer, not just reassurance.

The short version: telehealth EMDR works, it's been studied, and it's how a significant portion of my clients do this work. The longer version is below. 

If you're still getting oriented to what EMDR actually is before you get to the delivery question, I'd start with the fuller guide: What Ambitious Women in Georgia Need to Know About EMDR Therapy Before Starting. This post assumes some familiarity with the basics and focuses specifically on whether the online format changes what's possible.

What the Research Actually Shows* 

Telehealth EMDR isn't new, but the research base grew significantly after 2020, when in-person therapy became unavailable for an extended period and clinicians adapted. That shift created a much larger body of evidence than existed before.

What that research shows, consistently, is that telehealth EMDR produces outcomes comparable to in-person delivery for most presentations, including post-traumatic stress, anxiety, and complex trauma. The mechanism that makes EMDR effective, the bilateral stimulation and its effect on how the brain processes stored material, doesn't require physical proximity to work.

EMDRIA, the professional organization that sets standards for EMDR training and certification, has recognized telehealth delivery as a legitimate format. EMDRIA certification includes telehealth competency. This isn't a workaround I'm using for convenience. It's a recognized and supported way to deliver this treatment.

How the Mechanics Actually Work Online

The part people are most uncertain about is the bilateral stimulation. If the therapist usually guides your eye movements with their hand, what happens on a screen?

There are a few options, and I use all of them depending on what works best for the individual client.

Eye movements can be delivered through EMDR-specific software that uses a moving target on the screen. It's straightforward, and most clients adapt to it quickly. Tapping, which involves alternating taps on the knees or shoulders, is self-administered and translates easily to telehealth. Audio bilateral stimulation through headphones, alternating tones between left and right, is another option that works well remotely and doesn't require anything on screen at all.

What she needs on her end: a private space where she won't be interrupted for the session, a stable internet connection, and headphones. The headphones matter, both for audio BLS and for the basic privacy of the conversation.

What stays the same: the structure of the session, the pacing, the check-ins during processing sets, the resourcing work that comes before any processing begins. I'm still running the session. The screen changes the format, not the substance.

Who It Works Well For — and When In-Person Might Be the Better Fit

Telehealth works well for clients who are motivated and have a genuinely private space to work from, clients outside reasonable commuting distance, and clients whose schedules make a standing weekly in-person appointment difficult to sustain. If she's in Atlanta or Augusta or Macon and working full-time with kids, adding a drive to Rincon to the equation often means the therapy just doesn't happen. Telehealth removes that barrier.

There are situations where in-person may be the better choice. Early in the work, some clients benefit from more physical co-regulation: the presence of another person in the room, the ability to read the environment as genuinely safe. Clients with significant dissociation sometimes need more ground under them before telehealth processing is the right call. And some people simply prefer to be in a room with their therapist. That preference is valid and it's a real option for clients who can get to Rincon.

Neither format is the default. It's a conversation that happens during the consultation based on her presentation, her circumstances, and her preference. If in-person is the right call, that's what we'd recommend. If telehealth is, we'd talk through what she needs to set it up well.

The Practical Reality for Georgia Clients

Georgia is a large state with uneven access to specialized mental health care. EMDRIA-certified therapists are concentrated in metro areas. If she lives in a smaller city or a rural area, or if she's in a suburb of Atlanta but her schedule doesn't allow a long drive plus session time plus the drive back, the question of where to find a qualified trauma therapist is a real one.

Telehealth means she doesn't have to choose between commuting hours for specialized care and settling for whoever is geographically closest. The quality of the work isn't a function of the distance between us.

I've worked with clients across Georgia via telehealth and the format has not been the limiting factor. What matters is whether the fit is right, whether the approach is appropriate for her presentation, and whether she has what she needs on her end to do the work.

One Thing Worth Saying Directly

The skepticism about telehealth EMDR is sometimes less about the research and more about a deeper uncertainty: whether this kind of work can really happen at a distance, whether it will feel real, whether the connection through a screen will be enough.

That's worth naming because it's different from the logistics question. The therapeutic relationship is a real thing, and it develops over time regardless of format. Most clients who start with that uncertainty find, a few sessions in, that they've stopped thinking about the medium. The work is happening, and that's what they're focused on.

If it remains a concern, in-person is available. But for many clients, the question answers itself once the work begins.

Ready to Talk Through Which Format Makes Sense?

If you have questions about telehealth delivery, about what you'd need to set up a session from home, or about whether your situation is a better fit for in-person, that's exactly what the consultation is for.

You can read more about the EMDR therapy in Georgia or reach out directly to schedule a free consultation. There's no pressure to decide anything on the call.

*Current research on the effectiveness of EMDR in an online setting from EMDRIA.org.

Bates, A., Rushbrook, S., Shapiro, E., Grocott, M., & Cusack, R. (2020). CovEMERALD: Assessing the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of remotely delivered eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing following Covid-19 related critical illness: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BioMedCentral, 21: 929. Open Access: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04805-1

Bongaerts, H. Voorendonk, E. M., van Minnen, A., & de Jongh, A. (2021). Safety and effectiveness of intensive treatment for complex PTSD delivered via home-based telehealth. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 12(1), 1860346. Open access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2020.1860346

Bongaerts, H., Voorendonk, E. M., van Minnen, A., Rozendaal, L., Telkamp, B. S. D., & de Jongh, A. (2022). Fully remote intensive trauma-focused treatment for PTSD and complex PTSD. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 13(2): 2103287. Open access: https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2022.2103287

Bursnall, M., Thomas, B. D., Berntsson, H., Strong, E., Brayne, M. & Hind, D. (2022). Clinician and patient experience of internet-mediated eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing therapy. Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health, 28. Open access: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40737-022-00260-0

Faretta, E., Garau, M. I., Gallina, E., Pagani, M., & Fernandez, I. (2022). Supporting healthcare workers in times of COVID-19 with eye movement desensitization and reprocessing online: A pilot study. Frontiers in Psychology. Open access: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.964407

Farrell, D., Fadeeva, A., Zat, Z., Knibbs, L., Miller, P., Barron, I., Matthess, H., Matthess, C., Gazit, N., & Kiernan, M. D. (2022). A stage 1 pilot cohort exploring the use of EMDR therapy as a video-conference psychotherapy during Covid-19 with frontline mental health workers: A proof of concept study utilising a virtual blind 2 therapist protocol. Frontiers in Psychology, 13: 901855. Open access: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901855

Farrell, D., Moran, J., Zat, Z., Miller, P. W., Knibbs, L., Papanikolopoulos, P., Prattos, T., McGowna, I., McLaughlin, D., Barron, I., Matthes, C., & Kiernan, M. D. (2023). Group early intervention eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy as a video-conference psychotherapy with frontline/emergency workers in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder and moral injury – An RCT study. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. Open access: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129912

Fiani, F., Russo, S., & Napoli, C. (2023). An advanced solution based on machine learning for remote EMDR therapy. Technologies, 11(6), 172. Open access: https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies11060172

Fisher, N. (2021). Using EMDR therapy to treat clients remotely. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 15(1), 73-84.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/EMDR-D-20-00041

Kaptan, S. K., Varese, F., Yilmaz, B., Andriopoulou, P., & Husain, N. (2022). “Online delivery gave me privacy and distance from others”: Feasibility trial and qualitative evaluation of an online intervention for refugees and asylum seekers; LTP + EMDR G-TEP. Counselling & Psychotherapy Research. Open Access: https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12580

Lazzaroni, E., Invenizzi, R., Fogliato, E., Pagani, M., & Maslovaric, G. (2021). Coronavirus disease 2019 emergency and remote eye movement desensitization and reprocessing group therapy with adolescents and young adults: Overcoming lockdown with the butterfly hug. Frontiers in Psychology, Psychology for Clinical Settings, 701381. Open access: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.701381

Lenferink, L. I. M., Meyerbroker, K., & Boelen, P. A. (2020). PTSD treatment in times of COVID-19: A systematic review of the effects of online EMDR. Psychiatry Research, 293:113438. Open access: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113438

Liou, H., Lane, C., Huang, C., Mookadam, M., Joseph, M., & Hecker DuVal, J. (2022). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing in a primary care setting: Assessing utility and comparing efficacy of virtual versus in-person methods. Telemedicine and e-Health, Ahead of Print. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0454

Marotta-Walters, S.A., Jain, K., DeNardo, J., Kaur, P., & Kaligounder, S. (2018). A review of mobile applications for facilitating EMDR treatment of complex trauma and its comordities. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 12(1), 2-15. Open access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/1933-3196.12.1.2

Maxfield, L. (2021). Low-intensity interventions and EMDR therapy. Journal of EMDR Practice & Research, 15(2).  http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/EMDR-D-21-00009

McGowan, I. W., Fisher, N., Havens, J., & Proudlock, S. (2021). An evaluation of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy delivered remotely during the Covid-19 pandemic. BMC Psychiatry, 21, 560. Open access: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03571-x

Mischler, C., Hofmann, A., Behnke, A., Matits, L., Lehnung, M., Varadarajan, S., Rojas, R., Kolassa, I-T., & Tumani, V. (2021). Therapists’ experiences with the effectiveness and feasibility of videoconference-based eye movement desensitization and reprocessing. Frontiers in Psychology: Psychology for Clinical Settings, 748712. Open access: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.748712

Moench, J., & Billsten, O. (2021). Randomized controlled trial: Self-care traumatic episode protocol (STEP), computerized EMDR treatment of COVID-19 related stress. Journal of EMDR Practice & Research, 15(2), 99-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/EMDR-D-20-00047

Papanikolopoulos, P., Prattos, T., & Foundoulakis, E. (2022). Pandemic times and the experience of online EMDR practice in Greece: A qualitative study on obstacles and perspectives. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 16(3), 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/EMDR-2021-0033

Perri, R. L., Castelli, P., La Rosa, C., Zucchi, T., & Onofri, A. (2021). COVID-19, isolation, quarantine: on the efficacy of internet-based eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for ongoing trauma. Brain Sciences, 11(5), 579. Open access: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11050579

Perez, M. C., Estevez, M. E., Becker, Y., Osorio, A., Jarero, I., & Givaudan, M. (2020). Multisite randomized controlled trial on the provision of the EMDR integrative group treatment protocol for ongoing traumatic stress remote to healthcare professionals working in hospitals during the Covid-19 pandemic. Psychology and Behavioral Science, 15(4), 555920. DOI: 10.19080/PBSIJ.2020.15.555920. Open access: https://juniperpublishers.com/pbsij/PBSIJ.MS.ID.555920.php

Rosser, B. A., Agostinis, A., & Bond, J. (2023). Online eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy for chronic pain: A pilot-controlled trial. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 17(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/EMDR-2023-0009

Sagaltici, E., Cetinkaya, M., Kocamer Sahin, S., Gulen, B., & Karaman, S. (2022). Recent traumatic episode protocol EMDR applied online for COVID-19 related symptoms of Turkish health care workers diagnosed with COVID-19 related PTSD: A pilot study. Alpha Psychiatry, 23(3), 121-127. Open access: https://doi.org/10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2022.21763

Spence, J., Titov, N., Johnson, L., Dear, B. F., Wootton, B., Terides, M., & Zou, J. (2013). Internet-delivered eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (iEMDR): An open trial [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research, 2:79. Open access: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-79.v2

Tarquinio, C., Brennstuhl, M., Rydberg, J. A., Bassan, F., Peter, L., Tarquinio, C. L., & . . . Tarquinio, P. (2020). EMDR in telemental health counseling for healthcare workers caring for COVID-19 patients: A pilot study. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, published online. Open access: https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2020.1818014

Todder, D., & Kaplan, Z. (2007). Rapid eye movements for acute stress disorder using video conference communication. Telemedicine and e-Health, (13)4, 461-464. http://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2006.0058

Winkler, O., Dhaliwal, R., Greenwhaw, A., O’Shea, K., Abba-Aji, A., Chima, C., Purdon, S. E., & Burback, L. (2021). Web-based eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for adults with suicidal ideation: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Research Protocols, 10(11): e30711. Open access: https://doi.org/10.2196/30711

Yurtsever, A., Bakalim, O., Karaman, S., Kaya, S., & Konuk, E. (2022). The effect of the online eye movement desensitization and reprocessing early intervention protocol (EMDR R-TEP) for the risk groups with post-traumatic stress symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 935782. Open access: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.935782